<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    >
<channel>
    <title>HTTP Cookies &#8211; GTech Booster</title>
    <atom:link href="https://gtechbooster.com/i/http-cookies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <link>https://gtechbooster.com</link>
    <description>Technology • Engineering • Computing • History</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:37:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <language>en-ZA</language>
    <sy:updatePeriod>
    hourly    </sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>
    1    </sy:updateFrequency>
    
    <item>
        <title>Familiarising with Chrome Privacy Sandbox</title>
        <link>https://gtechbooster.com/familiarising-with-chrome-privacy-sandbox/</link>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabby]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP Cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monetisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gtechbooster.com/familiarising-with-chrome-privacy-sandbox/</guid>
                    <description><![CDATA[How did we get here, why do we need a sandbox for cross-site use cases. The short answer is the hegemony of marketeers and advertisers overwhelmed with varied degrees of hunger for user behavioral data towards their goals. The often unfair and extream measures is what has resulted in a proposal such as Privacy Sandbox [&#8230;]]]></description>
                            </item>
        <item>
        <title>HTTP Cookies Are Evil &#8211; Get Rid of Them &#8211; Blink Team</title>
        <link>https://gtechbooster.com/http-cookies-are-evil-get-rid-of-them-blink-team/</link>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabby]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 07:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category><![CDATA[NFiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GitHub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTP Cookies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTTPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W3C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web browser]]></category>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://gtechbooster.com/http-cookies-are-evil-get-rid-of-them-blink-team/</guid>
                    <description><![CDATA[The latest proposal to ban HTTP Cookies is from the development team of Blink, the layout engine at the core of Chrome. It may not come to anything, but it is another example of the browser makers attempting to set standards which suits them. Browser makers have a lot of power because what their creations [&#8230;]]]></description>
                            </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
